The Nation - News from Aug. 2, 1988
- Share via
Roadblocks to check drivers for signs of intoxication are ineffective and unconstitutional, the Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in upholding a lower court’s ruling against the state. “While the goals of the sobriety checkpoint program are laudable, the program fails to qualify as a reasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment,” the three-judge appeals panel wrote in a unanimous opinion. The ruling upheld the conclusions of Wayne County Circuit Judge Michael Stacey, who issued a permanent injunction against the roadblocks. The program devised by state police followed a blueprint drafted from check lane laws in 37 other states. Its prime model was Maryland’s program, and the opinion noted the testimony of a Maryland state police lieutenant who said checkpoints there yielded few drunken driving arrests.
More to Read
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.