A Time and Place for Expressions of Faith
- Share via
In an otherwise reasonably balanced article, Garry Abrams reveals a disturbing negative bias toward nonbelievers.
The statement, “In the rare instance when an employer imposes religion on employees, a disgruntled atheist or agnostic is usually ready to make a federal case out of it,” implies such individuals are especially irascible and over-reactive. Would not the substitution of “Christian employer” and “Jewish” or “Moslem employee” (or almost any other permutation of philosophies) have been equally applicable as well as prejudicial?
In a nation that boldly states its intention to “establish justice” and to “secure domestic tranquility,” the imposition of religious standards by someone with the authority to hire and fire is neither a matter for levity nor tacit acceptance.
ALEXANDER PRAIRIE
President, Atheists United
Sherman Oaks
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox twice per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
