What They Want Dole to Say
- Share via
Times reporters talked to voters who had said in a recent Times Poll that they were undecided or only weakly committed to a presidential candidate. This is what they said they would like to hear Bob Dole discuss in tonight’s acceptance speech.
EDWARD FRANCIS FARRELL JR., 43 a printer, East Brunswick, N.J.
“That he wouldn’t let the Christian coalition or religious right run the party. They are too deep in the platform. I think they will alienate people who might vote for him (Dole) because of their abortion stands. I just don’t go for them. I’m pro-choice.”
****
KEITH ROBERTS, 43, a construction contractor, Orem, Utah.
“Stop being a politician and be a human being and start looking at the real issues. We have become a country of politics and I don’t like it. I think it’s destroying our country . . . I’m not hung up on all of the key phrases being used in this battle like abortion or welfare reform. Those, to me, are Band-aids to real issues and problems.”
****
CHESTER FREEMAN, 74, retired businessman, Cullman, Ala.
“A sensible solution to the economy--not tax-cutting, but a budget-balancing working solution. I don’t think tax cuts are the answer at this time. I think we must reduce federal spending, on the basis of a gradual work-down. If you cut taxes, you’re going to have trouble.”
****
CHARLIE WILLIAMSON, 68, retired from wholesale building materials industry, Orlando, Fla.
“Some [specifics] on balancing the budget and taxes. Those are two things everybody seems to talk about and nobody has a clue about how to do it.”
****
KEVIN CURRIER, 29, a salesman, Buffalo, N.Y.
“The abortion issue. If he came out and said he will be pro-choice, maybe, possibly. Everything they talk about--education and crime--it’s always there and important, but they just say what the cameras want to hear.”
****
Hugh Marshall, 69. Retired engineer. Conway, S.C.
“Something that would resolve this abortion issue in the Republican Party. I’m inclined to be conservative and pretty much anti-abortion, but not solidly so; something that would allow all of those in the Republican Party to live within the Republican Party, regardless of what their beliefs are. Something that won’t split the party.”
More to Read
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox twice per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.