Juries should know about punishment
- Share via
Re “Justices find California’s sentencing law flawed, Jan. 23
A jury should be involved in the sentencing decision of every case. I never understood why we keep juries in the dark about the possible sentence that the defendants face, except in death penalty trials. Are we afraid that they might be too lenient or too harsh?
We require citizens to report for jury duty; to answer a lot of personal questions during jury selection; to sit through the trial and not form any opinions until it’s over; then to deliberate with 11 strangers until a verdict is reached. Why can’t we trust jurors with the knowledge that a guilty verdict means a sentence within a certain range? You can be certain that if jurors had this knowledge, our prisons would not be filling up with people serving 25 years to life for stealing a pizza, or with prisoners pleading guilty to crimes they did not commit to avoid this possible consequence.
Daniel J. Schmidt
Deputy public defender
Riverside County
More to Read
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox twice per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.