LETTERS
- Share via
Regarding Catharine Hamm’s On the Spot column about Hilton’s Best Rate Guarantee policy [“Room for Doubt,” Sept. 27]: I side with the Hilton on this one because it doesn’t seem as if there was any intentional deception or money spent that otherwise wouldn’t have been spent if not for the advertised guarantee. In other words: No harm, no foul.
Jeff Norman
Los Angeles
Inside the business of entertainment
The Wide Shot brings you news, analysis and insights on everything from streaming wars to production — and what it all means for the future.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
